[c-nsp] Growing BGP tables
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Fri Nov 26 11:09:48 EST 2004
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:22:03PM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> > > Which is a really good thing. AS5 doesn't *need* the /24 prefix, because
> > > the /16 will point in the same direction anyway.
> >
> > how does this help if you wish to offer all routes, guy tal mentioned earlier..
> > if one operator implements filtering they will immediately reduce the amnount of
> > transit traffic that they pull as the customer will be receiving more specifics
> > from another upstream
>
> Victory of economics over reason...
>
> Why would the downstream even *want* the /24 in the first place? There
> is no additional information to be gained by it (unless you're very
> near to the place of origin).
they dont know/they dont care/they dont know how?
> Most end-sites these days don't carry a full table anymore anyway, due to
> "it won't fit in my 3640".
i'm not seeing this in practice. afaik most of our custs take whatever we give
them
Steve
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list