[c-nsp] Sup2 12.2(18)SXD ip load-sharing

[Bruce Pinsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Gert Doering wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 11:43:08AM -0700, Bruce Pinsky wrote:
|
|>| Here is my situation.  I have customers that NAT that also have multiple t1
|>| to our Flex-Wan2 card.  Since they NAT I don't think per destination is a
|>| good answer however when I try to configure per-packet I get:
|>
|>I would think the opposite.  I would want to see flows to a destination go
|>out and come back in the same interface.  If you alternate between outbound
|>interfaces, seems like you run a high risk of breaking connections due to
|>lack of NAT state.
|
|
| Shouldn't NAT state (on Cisco routers) be shared among all interfaces
| configured as "ip nat outside", so that load sharing doesn't interfere
| with NAT state?  (As long as no fancy route-map NAT configurations
| with interface dependencies interfere, of course)
|

Yes. Poor choice of words in my case.  I should have said something like
"router" or "link".

| Of course it will not work if those T1s are terminated on different
| customer-side routers.
|

That's what I inferred.

- --
=========
bep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFBXa8iE1XcgMgrtyYRAiExAJ97eQAO5pgezJ5dAZPozk0rwAjEqACgkbTX
LWUiUIRMECwvfbWBVPAB//E=
=PSif
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----