[c-nsp] VRF question
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Mon Oct 11 10:25:17 EDT 2004
W2N-3.6-7401ASR-B#sh run int gig 0/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 146 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address 14.16.1.92 255.255.255.0
tag-switching ip
end
The interface looks just like any other MPLS interface.
Just globally you would prevent labels for being exchanged
via 'tag-switching advertise-tags <acl>'. What happens
in the forwarding path depends on the control plane being
set up and tags exchanged for the relevant prefixes.
In this scenario you can have ip and mpls packets going
in/out the same interface.
Rodney
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:10:27PM +0200, Per Carlson wrote:
> On 2004-10-11 15:45, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > You can easily have some tagged and some untagged packets
> > going out the same interface. You could create a dual loopback
> > configuration with IPV4 peering and VPNV4 peering and then just
> > block tags from being advertised for the IPV4 sessions that
> > carry the internet routes.
>
> How would the configuration of the interface look like? In my point of
> view, either MPLS is enabled or not.
>
> Per
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list