[c-nsp] Per packet Load balancing

[Amol Sapkal]

Hi Guys,
I am still following the active post of 'BGP Balacned' - thanks for it.

Now, I have implemented per packet load balancing, by disabling cef
and route-cache on both the interfaces from R1. Initially too, I had
disabled ip route-cache from the subinterfaces, but it seems the ip
route-cache command actually comes in action only after an application
on a physical interface (and not a sub-interface)


Though this has achieved the desired result, I am not sure how good it
is to disable cef and cache on a very busy router.

Thanks to all for the work arounds.



On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 17:01:34 +0200, Carlson Per <per.carlson at banetele.com> wrote:
> 
> > > What do you see? Is there some loadbalancing or none at
> > > all? What does 'ip cef <ip-address>' where <ip-adress>
> > > is the /28-net show? An alternative, but not the recommended 
> > > one (see posting from earlier in this list), is
> > > making CEF load-balance per-packet instead of per-destination.
> >
> > I do see traffic via R1-R2-CE. But it is less as compared to R1-CE. I
> > am not exactly aware of the difference in per-packet CEF and
> > per-destination CEF. Would be grateful for your inputs.
> 
> There is a topic named 'BGP Balanced', started August 24th, that
> discusses different loadbalancing techniques. Rodney Dunn
> (a Cisco guy) posted an excellent explanation the 25th.
> 
> Per
> 



-- 
Warm Regds,

Amol Sapkal

--------------------------------------------------------------------
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind 
- Mahatma Gandhi
--------------------------------------------------------------------