Routing performance database (Re: [c-nsp] 10 Mb internet traffic on a 3640?)

[Sam Stickland]

Oh, I understand that it would be entirely subjective. I was thinking of 
it just as a more of an easily searchable distillation of a lot of the 
information that flows around this mailing list.

But I take your point, it could be ill advised. Information requests on a 
mailing list are solicited.

S

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Wojtek Zlobicki wrote:

> The problem with such testing is that it is subjective.  Unless there
> is a proper test case and conditions are identical, its not fair to
> the vendors to claim that product X can only sustain Y megabits of
> throughput.  I dont want someone with a low end server telling me that
> my 6509 with a sup720 cannot sustain more than 100 Megabits of traffic
> on a GigE interface.
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:32:33 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Sam Stickland
> <sam_ml at spacething.org> wrote:
>>
>> There's been a lot of questions lately (as always!) about the performance
>> of various routers. Would there be any legal issues about with setting an
>> a site where people can list their real world experiences with the
>> performance of various pieces of kit?
>>
>> I guess it wouldn't really be any different from a hardware review, but
>> there's often clauses in licenses that prevent this sort of stuff.
>>
>> Anybody know? I don't mind setting it up.
>>
>> Sam
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------
> wojtek.zlobicki at gmail.com
>