[c-nsp] Discussion with 6500/7600 Sup Modules
David Sinn
dsinn at dsinn.com
Thu Apr 21 12:27:53 EDT 2005
The Sup2 with DFC's will only support the quoted (marketing math) 256Gb
if you have the fabric module installed.
Effectively the Sup2 and Sup32 are equivalent baring three things:
1) The Sup2 does support the addition of the Switch Fabric Module
2) The Sup2 has a PFC2 while the Sup32 has the PFC3B/BXL.
3) The Sup2 has the option of the MSFC2 while the Sup32 includes a
MSFC2
Since the Sup2 without a fabric operates in the same mode as a Sup32,
so they both have the same throughput capability of (marketing math)
32Gb. The primary functional difference is the features on the PFC, so
I would suggest looking into the PFC3B's feature set to see if that
more aligns with what you want to accomplish.
David
On Apr 21, 2005, at 8:41 AM, Dan Lockwood wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We are in the process of purchasing several new 6500/7600 devices for a
> network overhaul and I have a few questions about the practical
> application of the different supervisors. For core devices we want to
> run the new SUP720, my confusion is for the access layer. We have a
> large campus and data center that will be upgraded. The Sup1 is old
> and
> I wont buy that. That leaves me with the Sup2, Sup32 and 720.
> According to Cisco the New Sup32 only supports 32Gb while the Sup2 /w
> DFC supports 256Gb. Is this correct or am I misunderstanding
> something?
> So the two questions I'm struggling with are 1) should I push L3
> capabilities to the access switches and 2) What supervisor/series of
> line cards (2A, 32, 720) should I consider?
>
> Any other important issues I have failed to consider?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list