[c-nsp] defualt bandwidth range for Gig E interface on 3750 .

[Baldev Vaishnav]

Yeah .
 
 I am aware of the fact that interface BW is used by some routing protocols to calculate the metrics . and also the interface BW can be configered manually .
 
But nothing was configured on it and anyways it should have said   1000000 kbit
 and not 10000 Kbit

Baldev

"Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve at telecomplete.co.uk> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Elmar K. Bins wrote:

> steve at telecomplete.co.uk (Stephen J. Wilcox) wrote:
> 
> > That looks like a bug to me, from a 3548:
> > 
> > GigabitEthernet0/2 is down, line protocol is down 
> > Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0001.96c1.c81a (bia 0001.96c1.c81a)
> > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec, 
> > 
> > I cant imagine any reason for a Gig port saying anything other that 1000000 kbit
> 
> I can.
> 
> "bandwidth 1" does the trick:
> 
> GigabitEthernet2/0/10 is administratively down, line protocol is down (disabled)
> Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 0011.5c53.128a (bia 0011.5c53.128a)
> MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
> 
> Never forget, the bandwidth marker is only that: A marker, used in some
> routing protocols. It has nothing to do with the line's capacity.

sure, but the original poster said this was a 'default' output, so i assume 
there is no bandwidth configured and the bw should report the port speed..

Steve

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com