[c-nsp] Out of Order Packets
Paul Stewart
pauls at nexicom.net
Wed Apr 27 16:48:30 EDT 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
That's the best I've heard so far... unfortunately it's a big telco here
in Canada and getting someone to look into it is always the issue.. I'm
seeing packet loss as well (not sure if I mentioned that yet) and they
claim they don't see it... but we do every night when the traffic starts
to pickup...
Back on the phone with Bell again..;)
Thanks for the response...
Paul
Gert Doering wrote:
| Hi,
|
| On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 08:59:06PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote:
|
|>We are having a serious problem with some RAD gear that takes TDM
voice and
|>converts it to IP and then back to TDM. The gear (which I don't look
after or
|>know much about) keeps complaining about "packets out of order"..... the
|>connection is a pair of 6509's and a pair of 2924 switches in between them
|>using a 100 Meg LAN extension (via local telco).
|
|
| I bet the 100 Meg "LAN" is switched over something over something else
| (like "Ethernet over MPLS") and there is load-sharing and packet
reordering
| going on in this "something else".
|
| Show the result to your local telco, tell them "an ethernet link MUST NOT
| reorder packets, so what you're selling is not an ethernet link, go and
| fix it!".
|
| gert
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFCb/qeqMetgU57IuQRAq9GAJ9PJpCkJ3jZKtLDsGqOgAAJmeNksACfadQL
ARalmhpEZFwnoqtfqaECPMc=
=xAp7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list