[c-nsp] 12.2SXF?

[Rodney Dunn]

Kevin,

They should be rebuilds with bugfixes only for SE->SEC.
When new feature support is added there should be a new
letter. But sometimes due to testing cycles a feature
may be in the base release (say SE) but until we can
get it tested to declare official support it's not
announced. So therefore you may see something announced
in 25SEB for example that was in SE but just not fully
tested to declare support (ie: a new module or something).

Rodney


On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:13:25PM -0700, Kevin Graham wrote:
> Just stumbled across this in dynamic config tool -- yet another
> 12.2(18)SX derivative. Is there a product bulletin that explains the
> exotic dance ritual 12.2S is undergoing?
> 
> 3550 -- (25)SE -> (25)SEA -> (25)SEB -> (25)SEC
> 6000/720/3 -- (17)SX -> (17)SXA -> (17)SXB -> (18)SXD -> (18)SXE -> (18)SXF
> 4000 -- (20)EW -> (20)EWA
> 
> Rodney had mentioned on this list about 12.2S being spun off into
> platform-specific trains. This is understandable and explains a few of
> these hops, but particularly the 12.2SE progression has me baffled.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/