[c-nsp] MIBs for Processor and Memory utilization?

[Howard C. Berkowitz]

At 3:06 PM -0400 8/26/05, McLean Pickett wrote:
>Try the SNMP Object Navigator. You can do searches through the mibs that
>includes the descriptions. There are also links to the oid files that
>lists OID's on the page for each MIB file.
>
>http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?local=en
>
>Not the easiest, I've been fighting with it all day and finally gave up
>and opened a TAC case :)
>
>McLean


Thanks; that's the sort of thing that helps me retain my limited 
sanity. I wonder if there are times where one TAC opens a ticket with 
another?

>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Howard C.
>Berkowitz
>Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 2:41 PM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MIBs for Processor and Memory utilization?
>
>At 10:28 AM -0600 8/26/05, John Neiberger wrote:
>>   >>> "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb at gettcomm.com> 8/26/05 10:17:08 AM >>>
>>>First, is there any way to view the Cisco MIB library directly, rather
>
>>>than pulling down the .my files and running them through a compiler?
>>>
>>>If not, I'd appreciate pointers to the appropriate MIBs or OIDs that
>>>break processor and memory utilization. I'm trying to put together
>>>some procedures about comparing and contrasting internal effects of
>>>router exploits, with the external effects measured (at the
>>>surveillance level) with NetFlow.
>>>
>>>My particular lab uses 26yyXM routers, although if there are platform
>>
>>>specific MIBs, as with distributed switching, I'd appreciate a pointer
>
>>>there as well.
>>
>>I haven't had enough coffee yet today so I may be misinterpreting what
>>you're asking for, but take a look here:
>>
>>http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/MIBS/servlet/index
>>
>>Is that what you're looking for?
>>
>
>More the inverse of it. I'm trying to find the objects, presumably in a
>Cisco extended MIB, that report processor and memory statistics.
>Just having the names of MIBs doesn't suggest which Cisco MIBs contain
>data elements. If there were a search tool that could look for an OID
>given keywords, that's more what I need.