[c-nsp] Re: 512M RAM in NPE400 - known problem?

Tony Varriale tvarriale at comcast.net
Wed Aug 31 08:36:31 EDT 2005


I have a customer with rev 1.1 and 1.5 with 512MB of RAM.  The 1.1 has been 
running for 4ish years and the 1.5 about 1 year (the original 1.1 failed, 
1.5 was the replacement).

TV

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gert Doering" <gert at greenie.muc.de>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Re: 512M RAM in NPE400 - known problem?


> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 07:26:51AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>> Hm, I _do_ have rev 1.1:
> [..]
>> Is 1.1 affected, or should that be the fixed revision?
>
> Can't say anything about 1.1, but 1.0 works for us with 512 Mb:
>
> C7206VXR CPU EEPROM:
>        Hardware Revision        : 1.0
>        Top Assy. Part Number    : 800-08136-02
>        Part Number              : 73-5308-02
>        Board Revision           : B0
>
> cisco 7206VXR (NPE400) processor (revision A) with 491520K/32768K bytes of 
> memory.
>
>
> We have another NPE-400s that has 1.1 (Rev. D0) and one with 1.5 (Rev. 
> A0),
> but we haven't upgraded those to 512 Mb yet (256 Mb today).  Looks like
> there is some adventure to come.
>
> gert
>
> -- 
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> 
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany 
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025 
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list