[c-nsp] PPP Multilink

[noc ops]

I can certainly give 12.3 a go provided it doesn't break anything.


regards,
/virendra

Rodney Dunn wrote:
> Should be. I really perfer seeing people run the latest 12.3 mainline
> code for MLPPP as I remember we fixed a lot of bugs mid 12.3 for
> mlppp. 12.2(31) for basic MLPPP shold be ok but I can't remember
> if we support QOS with it there though.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:55:08PM -0800, noc ops wrote:
> 
>>in-line:
>>
>>Rodney Dunn wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:36:29PM -0800, noc ops wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>We are currently rolling out mlppp (6 x T1) on a 7206vxr w/ npe-400
>>>>engine. Was wondering if anyone can provide insight to on the following
>>>>questions.
>>>>
>>>>Is it recommended to disable fragmentation on ppp multilink?
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes. Fragmentation really isn't needed on T1 speed links.
>>
>>-------------
>>that's what i thought...thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Why would you want to disable cef on mlppp bundle? Can't remember where
>>>>I saw this reference but thought that I run this by the group for
>>>>confirmation.
>>>
>>>
>>>Only as a short term workaround to a switching patch bug but it
>>>should be reenabled as soon as the fix is identified.
>>
>>---------------
>>is it safe to leave it enabled on 12.2(31)?
>>
>>
>>
>>regards,
>>/virendra
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>appreciate any feedback.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>/virendra
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>