[c-nsp] recommended stable IOS version

[Dave Temkin]

You're stuck on 12.3T with the 2800 anyways - and 12.4 mainline is just
12.3T with no massive new features added in, so, there's no real reason to
fear 12.4 on these boxes.

-Dave

On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, John Neiberger wrote:

> I looked at the open caveats for 12.4(5) and was surprised to see that
> it has very few open caveats. It appears to be a rather stable release.
>
> John
> --
>
> >>> Dave Temkin <dave at ordinaryworld.com> 12/1/05 4:27:15 PM >>>
> Believe it or not, but 12.4 .3(I think)is stable on these boxes.  I
> did
> some very
> extensive testing with everything you've mentioned (except for RIP - I
> only verified basic functionality) and it was fine.
>
> -Dave
>
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Nassess, George (Contractor) wrote:
>
> > Hello list,
> >
> > We currently have routers that we own and support deployed with IOS
> > 12.2.23 and it looks as if this version is not available for newer
> 2800
> > series routers and is now a couple of major releases out of date.
> >
> > I am looking for some opinions on a nice stable version to upgrade
> to,
> > interested in avoiding bugs regarding Access-Lists, NAT, EIGRP, CEF,
> or
> > RIP v2.
> >
> > Thanks all,
> >
> > George "Gus" Nasses
> > Network Analyst
> > GMAC/RFC
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>