[c-nsp] PPP Multilink

[Rodney Dunn]

Are you saying that you think CSCeh95427, and CSCsa86946 is an issue
in 12.3 based on some debug work you did?

CSCeh95427 is marked as a regression caused by CSCsa86946 but
CSCsa86946 only went in 12.4 and 12.4T so it should not have
affected 12.3 in any way. 12.3 is under extremely tight commit
restrictions due to GD criteria moving forward. We have done
extensive reviews of all bugs and I'm not aware of any major
showstoppers currently. So your comments about a problem in
12.3 interest me. If you could elaborate more I'd appreciate it.

Rodney

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 09:34:22PM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> 
> Rodney and All,
> 
>   Stay away from 12.3 go right to 12.4
> 
>   We lost a customer because of that firmware rev. and because of Cisco's
> tech support
> incompetence, which had me on a wild goose chase with problems on a 1700,
> and
> boy was I pissed off about that one.
> 
>   Bugs involved CSCeh95427, and CSCsa86946 and I finally figured this out
> when
> working on a problem with a completely different customer and a different
> router.
> Fortunately the Cisco tech that helped with -that- one knew what he was
> doing.
> 
> Still not repaired in 12.3   IS repaired in 12.2 and 12.4
> 
> Ted
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn
> >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 6:39 PM
> >To: noc ops
> >Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PPP Multilink
> >
> >
> >Should be. I really perfer seeing people run the latest 12.3 mainline
> >code for MLPPP as I remember we fixed a lot of bugs mid 12.3 for
> >mlppp. 12.2(31) for basic MLPPP shold be ok but I can't remember
> >if we support QOS with it there though.
> >
> >On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:55:08PM -0800, noc ops wrote:
> >> in-line:
> >>
> >> Rodney Dunn wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 01:36:29PM -0800, noc ops wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>We are currently rolling out mlppp (6 x T1) on a 7206vxr w/ npe-400
> >> >>engine. Was wondering if anyone can provide insight to on
> >the following
> >> >>questions.
> >> >>
> >> >>Is it recommended to disable fragmentation on ppp multilink?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Yes. Fragmentation really isn't needed on T1 speed links.
> >> -------------
> >> that's what i thought...thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>Why would you want to disable cef on mlppp bundle? Can't
> >remember where
> >> >>I saw this reference but thought that I run this by the group for
> >> >>confirmation.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Only as a short term workaround to a switching patch bug but it
> >> > should be reenabled as soon as the fix is identified.
> >> ---------------
> >> is it safe to leave it enabled on 12.2(31)?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> /virendra
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>appreciate any feedback.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>regards,
> >> >>/virendra
> >> >>_______________________________________________
> >> >>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> >>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >> >
> >> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release
> >Date: 12/1/2005
> >