[c-nsp] 7500 RSP8 Throughput Ability
Atanas Yankov
xds at LanGame.Net
Fri Dec 9 10:30:28 EST 2005
7600/6500 sup720 is the best for your situation , second you can use
12xxx series with 2 GRP-Bs, but don't forget for 3 and more full BGP
sessions you will be need from 1Gbyte RAM to handle them .
br,
CCNP Atanas Yankov
Network Administrator
AngelSoft Ltd.
Gustavo Rodrigues Ramos wrote:
>Rodney Dunn wrote:
>
>
>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:59:03PM -0500, David Coulson wrote:
>>
>>Really guys, those cards were designed at the customer's request to give
>>them a physical GIG connectivity solution the core for moderate rates
>>while they upgraded the edges. If you are looking at GIGE/OC3 type
>>rates to/from the core don't waste your time with this box or these
>>cards because as soon as you start turning on features you will most
>>likely be unhappy.
>>
>>
>
>So, talking about that... what do you recommend to put into a core
>network (insted of 7500) to support gigabit traffic rate??? A box like
>Cisco 7301 can do that job?
>
>This box need to do about ten BGP-4 peers connections (two or three full
>routing), VRRP/HSRP like the diagram and support about 400 Mbps traffic
>in/out through then.
>
>
> BGP-4 peers BGP-4 peers
> \ | | / \ | | /
> | |
> GiE trunk GiE trunk
> +------|------+ +-------|------+
> | | | |
> | ???? +-----iBGP----+ ???? |
> | | | |
> +------|------+ +-------|------+
> | |
> GiE Trunk-----VRRP/HSRP------GiE Trunk
>
>Today I've got two 7513 with one GEIP+ each doing that job, however I
>can reach just 150 Mbps (dCEF is enabled).
>
>Regards,
>Gustavo.
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list