[c-nsp] SUP32 and Edge routing

[Ian Cox]

At 12:12 PM 12/14/2005 +0100, Tantsura, Jeff wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Quite strange, I've got a cisco presentation saying that Sub32 has same
>PFC3B & 3BXL options as 720....

At one stage PFC3bXL was meant to ship on Sup32 at the same time as 
PFC3b. Due to reasons which I don't want to go into, it did not 
happen. At present there is no public date when 3bXL will be 
available on Sup32.


Ian


>Regards,
>Jeff
>
>--
>Jeff Tantsura  CCIE# 11416
>Senior IP Network Engineer
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ian Cox [mailto:icox at cisco.com]
>Sent: 05 December 2005 22:19
>To: Mikael Abrahamsson; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SUP32 and Edge routing
>
>At 07:40 PM 12/4/2005 +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> >On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Simon Leinen wrote:
> >
> > > Mikael Abrahamsson writes:
> > >> Isn't the Sup720 limited to 256k routes?
> > >
> > > Yes with PFC3A/PFC3B.  The PFC3BXL supports 800'000 or so IPv4 unicast
> > > routes.  Note that both the Sup720 and the Sup32 can be outfitted with
> > > the PFC3BXL.
> >
> >This was a typo on my behalf, my question was related to the Sup32, but I
> >didnt know the Sup32 could be had with XL size TCAMs.
>
>Sup32 only comes with an option for 256k TCAM today. There is no 3bXL
>option for Sup32 in IOS or CatOS.
>
>
>Ian
>
>
> >--
> >Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/