[c-nsp] Load Balancing

[Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)]

A. Rahman Isnaini R Sutan <> wrote on Thursday, December 29, 2005 11:25
AM:

>> 
>> as far as I know, the behavior in this case is not documented, hence
>> it should be avoided.
> 
> So, let say I config  ip route a.a.a.a b.b.b.b c.c.c.c 110 against the
> similar one learned from ospf network d.d.d.d/e .
> The router will decide to route the traffic to a.a.a.a using c.c.c.c ?

yes, the static route will win since its default AD of 1 is lower than
OSPF's 110.

> Ever been tested before in cisco lab ?

I just tested this briefly..
 
> Sorry, it might be out of the topic.
> Does IBGP carry static distance metric information and propagate to
> it's IBGP neighbor ?
> Since I currently redistributing static route with metric higher than
> IBGP AD to another IBGP speaker.
> The neighbor knows this route with IBGP AD only.

AD has local significance only, it is not propagated in updates..

	oli