[c-nsp] Load Balancing

[A. Rahman Isnaini R Sutan]

A. Rahman Isnaini R. Sutan
-- Network Operation Division


>
> as far as I know, the behavior in this case is not documented, hence it
> should be avoided.

So, let say I config  ip route a.a.a.a b.b.b.b c.c.c.c 110 against the
similar one learned from ospf network d.d.d.d/e .
The router will decide to route the traffic to a.a.a.a using c.c.c.c ?
Ever been tested before in cisco lab ?

Sorry, it might be out of the topic.
Does IBGP carry static distance metric information and propagate to it's
IBGP neighbor ?
Since I currently redistributing static route with metric higher than IBGP
AD to another IBGP speaker.
The neighbor knows this route with IBGP AD only.


> In halfway recent code (since CSCdu32820), we use the protocol's default
> admin distance as tie-braker when two protocols configured with the same
> AD try to install the route into the RIB. If the protocols are identical
> (i.e. you have two OSPF processes), the oldest route wins, if I recall
> correctly..
> But, as I said: This config should be avoided.
>
> oli
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>