[c-nsp] Load Balancing, Part II

[A. Rahman Isnaini R Sutan]

Have you try to establish a "direct" look second bgp session with C via R2.
By route the peer address statically via R2 ?


A. Rahman Isnaini R. Sutan
-- Network Operation Division


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roy" <garlic at garlic.com>
To: "cisco-nsp" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2005 1:52 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] Load Balancing, Part II


> Hi.
> 
> Thanks to all who responded on my load balancing question on different 
> protocols.  Now onto part II of the quiz :-)
> 
> I have two routers R1 and R2 attached to a single customer C.  The 
> routers are connected via BGP with R1 and R2 as members of a 
> confederation.  I would like to load balance between the path R1-C and 
> R1-R2-C.
> 
> show ip bgp 1.1.1.0
> BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.0/24, version 8665091
> Paths: (2 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> Multipath: eBGP iBGP
>   4000
>     1.2.0.1 from 1.2.0.1
>       Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best
>   (65002) 4000
>     1.3.0.1 (metric 20) from 1.3.0.1
>       Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, confed-external
> 
> BGP doesn't seem to want to install both routes.  The AS length is the 
> same since the confederation AS (65002) gets removed.  How can one 
> determine why it won't multipath?
> 
> Roy
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>