[c-nsp] Different behaviour for static route on different IOS?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:51:37PM -0800, Tim Bulger wrote:
> Since when could you have a static route with a next hop which is not on a
> network directly connected to the router?! 

Since always (on real routers).  

Otherwise iBGP will not work, as you usually get the BGP routes with a 
next-hop value that is "somewhere else" (like "the loopback interface of 
the egress router", or even "the IP of the external eBGP peer" etc., 
depending on the specific setup and the usage of next-hop-self).

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de