[c-nsp] OT? Feedback on TWC upstream b/w

[Hyunseog Ryu]

Time Warner Cable is serving for consumer units mostly,
and Time Warner Telecom is serving for business units mostly.
So it is different organization.
As far as I know, Time Warner Telecom uses Juniper routers a lot,
and Time Warner Cable uses Cisco gears such as GSR routers...

Hyun

Adam Greene wrote:
> Thanks all, this feedback is extremely helpful. The Time Warner rep's
> material clearly states Time Warner Cable. Sounds like most people
> on this list have experience with Time Warner Telecom. Hmmmm....
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Adam Maloney" <adam at whee.org>
> To: "Adam Greene" <maillist at webjogger.net>
> Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT? Feedback on TWC upstream b/w
> 
> 
> 
>>This is the 250M friend...
>>
>>Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:25:45 -0600
>>From: Kevin Scheunemann <kevin at honeycomb.net>
>>To: Adam Greene <maillist at webjogger.net>,
>>     "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OT? Feedback on TWC upstream b/w
>>
>>I would have to assume that this is Time Warner Telecom instead of Time
>>Warner Cable (Road Runner).
>>OR does TWC hand off fiber to businesses?
>>But if it's TWTC, we've been very pleased with time warner telecom.
>>
>>Kevin
>>---
>>[This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection
> 
> System]
> 
>>
> 
> ---
> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
>