[c-nsp] Inverse multiplexing DS3s to larger interfaces?

Anthony D Cennami acennami at neupath.com
Wed Feb 23 13:32:38 EST 2005


Your carrier(s) will need to support the layer 2 imux solution on their
end as well, not the same thing as l3 load balancing or virtual channels.

an ons will obviously support this, but your carrier would have to perform
the same thing on their end; whatever the equipment you use.


>
> We've currently got a pair of GSRs tied together with 7 DS3s from two
> different carriers and are load balancing via OSPF.  This
> method has worked pretty well, but the technique tops out at
> maximum-paths 8 on the GSR.
>
> I'm looking for a more scalable way to multiplex these DS3s into
> something larger and feed them into my GSRs to reduce the number of
> layer 3 paths between the two locations.
>
> Going to larger interfaces is currently not an option with one of the
> carriers, and we want to maintain dual carriers for redundancy if
> possible.  We're currently using the 6 Port Packet over DS3 cards and
> the interfaces don't support multilink PPP or multilink frame-relay.
>
> What have folks used that worked well for this application?
>
> The Cisco ONS 15454 using enhanced DS3 cards looks like it
> might be a possibility, but I don't have any experience with the
> platform.
>
> TIA!
>
> --
> Tom
>
> ======================================================================
>    "Z-80 system stack overflow.  Shut 'er down Scotty, the system's
>          sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
>
> Thomas D. Simes                                 simestd at netexpress.com
> ======================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list