[c-nsp] Injecting Routes Remotely
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Mon Feb 28 05:46:51 EST 2005
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:25:06AM +0000, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> > if you put the linux box inline why bother with nat, you can just perform
> > the static routing towards the nas thats required.. i posted a workable
> > solution before that was basically that.
>
> I'd go for BGP. That way, no change to the physical network layout needs to
> be done (no additional boxes in the packet path), and you can insert the route
> with a BGP next-hop pointing to the RAS server in question.
>
> BGP has its own caveats, but I think it's a lot less intrusive than all the
> other variants (NAT, inline Linux boxes, ...)
sorry 'earlier post' was a few days ago.. yes i suggested injecting bgp to the
hop before the nas with next-hop of the nas
of course you will still need somewhere to put the bgp in, something like zebra
on the radius server
Steve
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list