[c-nsp] 12.0.30S (NPE-150)

Roy garlic at garlic.com
Sat Jan 8 02:34:16 EST 2005


>From what I can tell on CCO, the following have reached end-of-life for
software upgrades

NPE-100
NPE-150
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/prod_eol_notice09186a00
8032d41c.html
NPE-200
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/prod_eol_notice09186a00
8032d592.html
NPE-175
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/prod_eol_notice09186a00
80092106.html


If I read the following correctly, the only NPE left for non-VXR is the
NPE-225

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps341/products_installation_g
uide_book09186a008009c154.html

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Ted Mittelstaedt
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:51 PM
To: Rodney Dunn; Dave Temkin
Cc: Brian Feeny; 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 12.0.30S (NPE-150)



Thanks for the heads up Rodney, I'll have to dust off our
backup NPE-150 off the shelf and get it on Ebay before
this gets too widely known. ;-)

Is the NPE-200 going to meet a similar fate with the 12.0
IOS train?

Ted

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Rodney Dunn
> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 9:43 AM
> To: Dave Temkin
> Cc: Brian Feeny; 'cisco-nsp'
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 12.0.30S (NPE-150)
>
>
> On an NPE-150?
>
> Most likely not:
>
> CSCee11101
>
> The NPE-100 and NPE-150 network processing engines for Cisco 7200
> Series routers
> will not boot on Cisco IOS Software versions after the integration of
> CSCec14039 or CSCee04235.
>
> The NPE-100 and NPE-150 have reached end of software support.
>
>
> and CSCec14039 was integrated in:
>
> 12.0(27.02)S01
>
> Rodney
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 12:32:44PM -0500, Dave Temkin wrote:
> > Been using it for a couple of weeks for AToM/L2TpV3 traffic w/ ISIS and
> > it's been stable.
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Brian Feeny wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can anyone comment on the stability of 12.0.30S?
> > >
> > > Anyone using it? If not, which 12.0S code are you deploying?
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ------
> > > Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP    	e: signal at shreve.net
> > > Network Engineer           			p: 318.213.4709
> > > ShreveNet Inc.             			f: 318.221.6612
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list