[c-nsp] VLSM
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Tue Jan 11 13:39:27 EST 2005
its true there may be some space that was assigned pre-CIDR still in use on the
Internet but generally most ppl have received CIDR allocations or of those
pre-CIDR networks most/all of them BGP with the internet from a classless router
you are correct tho, the semantics is perhaps unimportant, but generally use of
incorrect terminology also means their understanding of the actual networking is
incorrect too.
Steve
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN wrote:
> i know that the education of network guyz is outdated but some of the thingz
> being stated hear are knee jerk bandwagon jump-on..
>
>
> since when is a /16 size chunk of addresses not a class 'b' space.
>
> i think what manner in which the size of a space is called as long as one understands
> what it speak of. much ado about nothing methinks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of lists at hojmark.org
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 3:59 PM
> To: 'matthew zeier'; 'Gert Doering'; 'Shaun'
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] VLSM
>
>
> > However, I can't get people (sales) to stop calling it "class c".
>
> Even worse is when they (and some 'techs') call everything /24 a "class C"
> and a every /16 a "class B", even when it's 10.10.10/24 and 10.10/16, for
> example.
>
> Yuck.
>
> -A
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list