[c-nsp] Deferred packets on 2950 10/full interface
Church, Chuck
cchurch at netcogov.com
Sat Jan 15 09:47:15 EST 2005
Guys,
Deferred frame counts are simply the number of times that the
switch tried to put a frame on the wire, and the medium was busy. I
believe those deferred will be re-tried after a random backoff period.
As you can see, there are no output drops, so I wouldn't worry about it.
I think that frame will just sit in the TX ring for a few more
microseconds Check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps605/products_configura
tion_guide_chapter09186a0080112d29.html#62679
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
cchurch at netcogov.com
PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4371A48D
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 9:25 AM
To: Michael K. Smith
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Deferred packets on 2950 10/full interface
Hello Mike,
Can you please tell me why running cdp is not recommended?
Thanks,
Mike Hayes
Michael K. Smith wrote:
> On 1/14/05 2:25 PM, "Clinton Work" <clinton at scripty.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I'm seeing 3716 deferred frames on a 10/full interface. I suspect a
>>duplex mismatch even though the Telco assures me that their interface
is
>>10/full as well. Anybody seen this problem on another 2950 switch?
>>
>>
>>Router#show int fa0/1
>>FastEthernet0/1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
>> Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 000e.38a0.3901 (bia
000e.38a0.3901)
>> Description:
>> MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
>> reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>> Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
>> Keepalive set (10 sec)
>> Full-duplex, 10Mb/s
>> input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
>> ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
>> Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:05, output hang never
>> Last clearing of "show interface" counters 6w0d
>> Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops:
0
>> Queueing strategy: fifo
>> Output queue :0/40 (size/max)
>> 30 second input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>> 30 second ouxtput rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>> 2979697 packets input, 477032533 bytes, 0 no buffer
>> Received 2612753 broadcasts, 241 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>> 316 input errors, 0 CRC, 75 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>> 0 watchdog, 2612346 multicast, 0 pause input
>> 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
>> 1110744 packets output, 296966944 bytes, 0 underruns
>> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
>> 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 3716 deferred
>> 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 PAUSE output
>> 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>>
>>IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(13)EA1, RELEASE
>>SOFTWARE (fc1)
>>Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
>>Compiled Tue 04-Mar-03 02:14 by yenanh
>>Image text-base: 0x80010000, data-base: 0x805A8000
>>Model number: WS-C2950-12
>>
>>
>
> I only say this for troubleshooting purposes. I'm fairly certain you
will
> see duplex mismatch error messages in your log if you have CDP enabled
(and
> if you're logging, of course). However, I would not recommend running
CDP
> after you determine if there is a mismatch.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list