[c-nsp] Re: 6500 Port Monitor

Todd, Douglas M. DTODD at PARTNERS.ORG
Tue Jan 18 09:36:14 EST 2005


Hey folks:

We run spans/monitors ports all the time and we have not found such a
limitation.  One would want to have the monitor port in the same vlan as the
monitor source to catch ALL traffic. It seems that you will catch more traffic
by moving the port in the same vlan as the span, just seems to be the better way
to sniff. I would check to make sure that you are not getting errors on your
port as this might be one cause of your traffic limitation.

==DMT>

%SIG%

Douglas M. Todd, Jr.
Network Engineering (MGH/CNY/NSMC/MCLEAN)
Partners Health Care
Building 149 13th Street
Location: 149-10-10056E
Charlestown, MA 02129-2000 (MGH)
(T): 617.726.1403
(F): 617.724.9871
Security:
Verisign S/N: 7b1bb86860eb26a53b57c8acb8e9fc4f
pgp: search keyserver for: dtodd at partners.org 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person or
entity 
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information.  
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action 
in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended

recipient is prohibited.  If you received this email in error, please contact
the 
sender and delete the material from any computer.  

old>>-----Original Message-----
old>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
old>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
old>>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 07:16
old>>To: Ziv Mosery; Piltrafilla
old>>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
old>>Subject: [c-nsp] Re: 6500 Port Monitor
old>>
old>>Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the 
old>>limit is that both ports have to be in the same Vlan.
old>>
old>>Scott
old>>
old>>-----Original Message-----
old>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
old>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ziv Mosery
old>>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:06 AM
old>>To: Piltrafilla; Ziv Mosery
old>>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
old>>Subject: [c-nsp] Re: 6500 Port Monitor
old>>
old>>Thanks I found the solution but I don't know what the problem was.
old>>I had 2 destination ports both 10/100/1000 ports, one on 
old>>1000MB and one on 100MB.
old>>Was I limited because of the 100MB port?
old>>Or is there some kind of limit after all?
old>>After I did monitor only to the 1000MB port I was able to 
old>>get 160MB on the monitor, my probe isn't able to get more 
old>>than that so I don't know If there is a 200MB limit or not.
old>>
old>>Thanks,
old>>Ziv
old>>
old>>
old>>-----Original Message-----
old>>From: Piltrafilla [mailto:piltrafilla at gmail.com]
old>>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 11:58 AM
old>>To: Ziv Mosery
old>>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
old>>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 Port Monitor
old>>
old>>I have done vlan monitor sessions on that way without any 
old>>bandwidth limitation on SupII and Sup720. Could you paste 
old>>destination interface configuration and 'sh ip interface' 
old>>information?
old>>
old>>Regards,
old>>
old>>On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:38:06 +0200, Ziv Mosery 
old>><zmosery at mercury.com>
old>>wrote:
old>>> Hi all,
old>>> 
old>>> I am trying to do port monitoring from a VLAN to a GigE 
old>>destination.
old>>> 
old>>> For some reason I am don't get at the destination more 
old>>then 100MB.
old>>> 
old>>> Any reason for that?
old>>> 
old>>> Switch details: 6500 Sup2 MSFC2.
old>>> 
old>>> Configuration used:
old>>> 
old>>> monitor session 2 source vlan 13
old>>> 
old>>> monitor session 2 destination interface Gi10/45
old>>> 
old>>> Anyone knows of limitations that the switch might have 
old>>regarding port 
old>>> monitor?
old>>> 
old>>> Thanks in advance,
old>>> 
old>>> Ziv
old>>> 
old>>> 
old>>___________________________________________________________
old>>___________
old>>> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email 
old>>Security System.
old>>> For more information please visit 
old>>http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
old>>> 
old>>___________________________________________________________
old>>___________
old>>> _______________________________________________
old>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
old>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
old>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
old>>>
old>>
old>>___________________________________________________________
old>>___________
old>>This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email 
old>>Security System.
old>>For more information please visit 
old>>http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
old>>___________________________________________________________
old>>___________
old>>_______________________________________________
old>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
old>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
old>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
old>>
old>>_______________________________________________
old>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
old>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
old>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
old>>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list