[c-nsp] Growing BGP tables

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:41:14AM -0500, Rodney Dunn wrote:
> What about if we just had a per neighbor filter that
> would filter out more specific prefixes as they come in.
> Once the more specific is filtered then it's gone until
> you do a soft clear to get it back.
> Something along these lines:
> 
>  router bgp 100
>   address-family ipv4 unicast
>   neighbor x.x.x.x leaked-specifics deny [inbound|outbound]

This would do fine for me.  

I wonder how it would work, though, as it might be necessary to revive 
a more-specific when the supernet is withdrawn?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de