[c-nsp] Changing from iBGP to eBGP - Again
Mark Tohill
Mark at u.tv
Wed Jul 6 12:55:12 EDT 2005
Oliver,
Our current setup look something like:
PoP No.1 PoP No.2
WAN
|----------------------------------------|
| |
PriRouter ---LAN----- SecRouter PriRouter ---LAN--- SecRouter
| [HSRP] | | [HSRP] |
| | | |
ibgp ibgp ibgp ibgp
| | | |
| | | |
ProviderRtr1---LAN----ProviderRtr2
ProviderRtr1---LAN----ProviderRtr2
| |
| |
ProviderRtrX ProviderRtrX
| |
| ----------------------------------------|
WAN
Provider Provider
Pop No.1 Pop No.2
I hope that makes sense!
Following points:
We announce chunk of our class B from each of our PoP's (non-contiguous)
Neighbor relationships between us and provider are all iBGP
We are not implementing route-reflectors, communities, confederations
etc.,
just have multiple neighbor statements, alot of repetition. Probably
about six ibgp neighbors per router.
Synchronization not running
Will I post configs....? :)
Thanks
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboehmer at cisco.com]
Sent: 06 July 2005 16:50
To: Mark Tohill; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Changing from iBGP to eBGP - Again
Mark,
it would be best if you pasted your current BGP config and topology so
we know what you are doing today. I assume you have an iBGP peer to your
upstream, and do route-reflector-client to your iBGP peers in order to
reflect the upstream routes to them and vice versa.
Changing this to an eBGP config should be easy, you wouldn't need
RR-client configuration anymore, and you want to investigate
next-hop-self on your iBGP peers (possibly not a requirement as you had
to advertise the upstream's next-hop into your IGP previously).
Or do you also need to change your ASN, so you'd need to touch all
routers? This is a larger migration task than just change one neighbor..
please clarify..
oli
Mark Tohill <> wrote on Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:37 PM:
> I realize this is probably against rules of list but I'm reposting
> this during what seems a busy time.
>
>
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Mark Tohill
> Sent: 05 July 2005 11:32
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Changing from iBGP to eBGP
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We're hoping to change our setup with our sole up-stream provider
> (peered with them across 2 x PoPs) from iBGP to eBGP. We hope this
> will give us more flexibility and control in the future
>
>
>
> - we accept the full routing table.
>
> - advertise non-contiguous (!!!) portions our our address
> space from each of our PoP's.
>
> - already secured our own ASN from RIPE.
>
> - have out-of-date route objects in RIPE which we are hoping
> to amend. (or our provider, they maintain them)
>
> - hope to request this change fairly soon.
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone out there hands-on experience of same/similar?
>
>
>
> Apart from neighbor configuration (remote-as etc...), are there any
> other major config changes?
>
>
>
> Are there any potential pitfalls?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list