[c-nsp] 7206VXR vs 6500 series for PPPOE termination

[Nitzan Tzelniker]

if the users come on L2TP tunnel the MWAM have big problam because the
max MTU between the MWAM and the SUP is 1524

why not 7301 ? 

Nitzan

On 7/12/05, Paul Stewart <pauls at nexicom.net> wrote:
> Hi there...
> 
> We have some 6509's inhouse currently with Sup2/MSFC2's and love them....
> 
> Our Redback units for DSL termination are getting old and need to be
> replaced.  Was thinking 7206VXR with NPE-G1 card etc.... but we have no 7200
> series gear in house at moment so no spares etc.
> 
> This got me thinking of using a small 6500 series chassis with the
> Sup2/MSFC2....  we have spare Sup's and linecards etc...
> 
> Do I need the MWAN card for PPPOE termination?  We get our ADSL sent to us
> via l2tp tunnels from a telco and also via an OC-3 interface to local
> DSLAMS.  Anyone using the 6500 series for PPPOE?
> 
> We don't want to be "test pilots" and find out what everyone who was smart
> about this was using 7200's.... everyone we've talked to is using them and
> not 6500's... so why? :)
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paul
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>