[c-nsp] 6509 and ws-x6748 and power
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Jun 9 08:42:54 EDT 2005
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Brad Swanson wrote:
> Yep, 4000watt power gets you 3795 available...94.8% of stated power. Can I
> only pay 94% then? :)
Perhaps we all should demand a 6% refund :-)
-Hank
>
> >sho env power
> PS1 Capacity: 3795.12 Watts (90.36 Amps @42V)
> PS2 Capacity: 3795.12 Watts (90.36 Amps @42V)
> PS Configuration : PS1 and PS2 in Redundant Configuration.
>
> Total Power Available : 3795.12 Watts (90.36 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Power Chassis Limit : 3780.00 Watts (90.00 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Power Chassis Recommended : 3780.00 Watts (90.00 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Power Available for Line Card Usage : 3780.00 Watts (90.00 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Power Drawn From the System : 1606.50 Watts (38.25 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Power Drawn by the Chassis : 0.00 Watt
> Total Power Drawn by the modules : 1606.50 Watts (38.25 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Inline Power Drawn From the System : 0.00 Watts ( 0.00 Amps
> @42V)
> Total Power Reserved as localpool for modules: 0.00 Watt
> Remaining Power in the System : 2188.62 Watts (52.11 Amps
> @42V)
> Configured Default Inline Power allocation per port: 15.40 Watts ( 0.37 Amps
> @42
> V)
>
> Slot power Requirement/Usage :
>
> Slot Model PowerRequested PowerAllocated CardStatus
> Watts A @42V Watts A @42V
> ---- ----------------------- ------- ------ ------- ------ ----------
> 4 325.50 7.75 0.00 0.00 power-bad
> 5 WS-SUP720-BASE 315.00 7.50 315.00 7.50 ok
> 6 WS-SUP720-BASE 315.00 7.50 315.00 7.50 standby
> 7 WS-X6748-GE-TX 325.50 7.75 325.50 7.75 ok
> 8 WS-X6748-GE-TX 325.50 7.75 325.50 7.75 ok
> 9 WS-X6748-GE-TX 325.50 7.75 325.50 7.75 ok
>
> Insufficient DC voltage levels detected on module 4
> TTCIDF5BAKSWT002> (enable)
>
> >From: Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il>
> >To: "David Prall" <dcp at dcptech.com>, "'Brad Swanson'"
> ><lakepepin at hotmail.com>, <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> >Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 6509 and ws-x6748 and power
> >Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:36:42 +0300
> >
> >At 09:46 PM 08-06-05 -0400, David Prall wrote:
> >
> >I can dig that, but when I order a 6500 with a 3000W power supply, I don't
> >expect to get only 2770W:
> >
> >gp1#sho power
> >system power redundancy mode = redundant
> >system power redundancy operationally = non-redundant
> >system power total = 2771.16 Watts (65.98 Amps @ 42V)
> >system power used = 1807.68 Watts (43.04 Amps @ 42V)
> >system power available = 963.48 Watts (22.94 Amps @ 42V)
> > Power-Capacity PS-Fan Output Oper
> >PS Type Watts A @42V Status Status State
> >---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------ ------ -----
> >1 WS-CAC-3000W 2771.16 65.98 OK OK on
> >2 none
> > Pwr-Allocated Oper
> >Fan Type Watts A @42V State
> >---- ------------------ ------- ------ -----
> >1 WS-C6K-13SLT-FAN2 298.20 7.10 OK
> > Pwr-Requested Pwr-Allocated Admin Oper
> >Slot Card-Type Watts A @42V Watts A @42V State State
> >---- ------------------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ----- -----
> >1 WS-X6582-2PA 105.00 2.50 105.00 2.50 on on
> >2 WS-X6582-2PA 105.00 2.50 105.00 2.50 on on
> >3 WS-X6582-2PA 105.00 2.50 105.00 2.50 on on
> >4 WS-X6582-2PA 105.00 2.50 105.00 2.50 on on
> >7 WS-SUP720-3BXL 328.44 7.82 328.44 7.82 on on
> >8 (Redundant Sup) - - 328.44 7.82 - -
> >9 WS-X6748-GE-TX 432.60 10.30 432.60 10.30 on on
> >
> >Not nice.
> >
> >-Hank
> >
> >>Brad,
> >>What power supplies? DFC's on the cards? This is the most power hungry
> >>card
> >>that can be installed. Have a look at
> >>http://www.cisco.com/go/powercalculator A 6509 with 2500 Watt Power
> >>Supplies
> >>is at 82% with only the 2 Sup-720's and 4 6748's without DFC's. With DFC's
> >>the 2500W is at 99%. If you have any other cards in there it is
> >>overloaded/underpowered.
> >>
> >>David
> >>
> >>--
> >>David C Prall dcp at dcptech.com http://dcp.dcptech.com
> >>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> >> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Brad Swanson
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:27 PM
> >> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> > Subject: [c-nsp] 6509 and ws-x6748 and power
> >> >
> >> > TAC case already open. Bad chassis...? 6509 with dual sup720 3a's,
> >> > ws-x6748-ge-tx cards in mod's 4, 7, 8, 9. Two weeks ago the
> >> > mod in slot 4
> >> > died with the error "power-bad". Thinking the card died, we
> >> > replaced with
> >> > new. Just today the new card dies the same death, moved it
> >> > to slot 3, same
> >> > result. Booted switch, still dead card.
> >> >
> >> > Some messages:
> >> > a fabric-sync error showed up right before the module died
> >> > sho mod 4 gets unknown card, for module-type and power-bad for status.
> >> > sho env all gets nothing showing up in slot 4, yet under Slot power
> >> > requirements/usage slot 4 shows "Insufficient DC voltage
> >> > levels detected on
> >> > module 4"
> >> > on reboot: %SYS-3-MOD_PWRFAIL:Module 4 failed to power up
> >> >
> >> > Power to the device is data center power, doesn't get any
> >> > cleaner as far as
> >> > power.
> >> >
> >> > Bad connectors on the backplane for power?
> >> >
> >> > Brad Swanson
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >> >
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> >> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
> >
>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> This Mail Was Scanned By Mail-seCure System
> at the Tel-Aviv University CC.
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list