[c-nsp] BGP table growth and memory

Pete Templin petelists at templin.org
Tue Jun 21 14:01:42 EDT 2005


Chris Cappuccio wrote:

> I just moved my RSP4s to 12.0(26)S6 just for this reason.

Stay far away from 12.0(31)S.  Memory usage wasn't particularly 
impacted, but packet loss (input ignores) was.  Ugh.  Sounds like the 
VIP code is horribly inefficient, but our TAC case is progressing like 
molasses.

pt


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list