[c-nsp] BGP table growth and memory

David J. Hughes bambi at Hughes.com.au
Wed Jun 22 01:00:49 EDT 2005


> Instead of not installing the aggregate's member routes and potentialy 
> missing them when the aggregate gets withdrawn, the way to implement 
> this is as a feature to suppress ADVERTISING the member prefixes, even 
> while keeping them in the table.

Good call Joe.  Keeping the garbage at the border but not sending it on 
to your RRs or other iBGP peers gets us most of what we want without 
much complication at all.

Now, if Rodney can make the feature request case visible again and we 
can get more people to vote for it we may get somewhere with this.


David
...



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list