[c-nsp] IP unnumbered question. Are isp's using this alot?

[Rodney Dunn]

And with /31 support you can even be more conservative.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:20:55PM -0700, Scott Granados wrote:
> I have not run in to this at all.
> 
> Generally, all my circuits are and always have been /30's between them, more
> times than not actual routed ips.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joseph Jackson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 5:14 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] IP unnumbered question. Are isp's using this alot?
> 
> Hi all,
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>             My company just got a new t1 line from a different isp than our
> main one for backup incase the primary fails.  When they gave me the ip
> address info I noticed that there wasn't anything listed for the wan side of
> the router.  When I called to ask about this they informed me that on their
> edge devices they do not give ip addresses and I must use the ip unnumbered
> command.  What I am getting at here is is this common for ISP's to do now?
> Is this a trend that has been gaining ground?  When I spoke to my boss about
> this he wasn't too happy.  The other circuits that we have for internet
> access all came with an ip to use for the wan interface. Even a circuit from
> the same company that we use for a whole other network has a wan ip address.
> Anyone else see this a lot?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
> Joseph Jackson
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/