[c-nsp] Cisco MultiLink PPP

[Eric Knudson]

As long as the correct interface bandwidth is configured, the correct
weight should be assigned to each member link, viewable with a 'show
ppp multi.'



On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 23:52:27 -0800 (PST), Lawrence Wong
<lawrencewong72 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> --- Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dennis Peng wrote:
> >
> > > > >> were having.  Am I right in thinking that
> > MLPPP avoids the sort of
> > > > >> out of order packet arrival that per-packet
> > cef load sharing can
> > > > >> cause?...while still doing nearly perfect
> > load sharing across a
> > > > >> number of T1s?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, both true..
> >
> > With framentation disabled and Nx
> > parrallel/identical T1 circuits in the
> > multilink bundle, are those assumptions (really just
> > the ordering) still
> > [supposed to be] true?
> >
> > For the POP I converted, which is now a 4 T1
> > multilink group, I'm seeing
> > as close to perfect load sharing as can be measured.
> 
> Is it a requirement to have N identical links (i.e. 4
> x T1) or can I have 1 x T1 + 1 x 512kbps?
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>