[c-nsp] CEF-based per-packet load-sharing under MPLS VPN

[Everton da Silva Marques]

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:42:28PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> 
> > ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/0:0
> > 10.4.62.2 
> > ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/1:0
> > 10.6.3.130 
> > ip route vrf 5500000001-99 10.14.62.0 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.1
> 
> just noticed: does it look any different when you remove the next-hop?
> 
> those are p2p links, right?

Yes, they're p2p. Removal of the next-hop
does not seem to make things different:

#sh run | i ip route vrf 5500000001-99
ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/0:0
ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/1:0
ip route vrf 5500000001-99 10.14.62.0 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.1

#sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf 5500000001-98 10.14.62.0
BGP routing table entry for 15180:4829:10.14.62.0/32, version 358152
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table 5500000001-98)
  Not advertised to any peer
  Local, imported path from 15180:4824:10.14.62.0/32
    0.0.0.0 (via 5500000001-99) from 0.0.0.0 (200.202.113.165)
      Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 32768, valid, external, best
      Extended Community: RT:15180:1 RT:15180:4701 RT:15180:5001
        RT:15180:5009

#sh ip cef vrf 5500000001-98 10.14.62.0
0.0.0.0/0, version 0, epoch 0, attached, default route handler
0 packets, 0 bytes
  Flow: AS 0, mask 0
  via 0.0.0.0, 0 dependencies
    valid null adjacency

Regards,
Everton