[c-nsp] CEF-based per-packet load-sharing under MPLS VPN

[Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)]

> In my test scenario, interfaces Serial6/0/0:0 and
> Serial6/0/1:0 are attached to vrf 5500000001-99.
> 5500000001-98 is the other test vrf on the same
> PE. I have added these recursive routes for the
> test network 10.14.62.0/32:
> 
> ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/0:0
> 10.4.62.2 
> ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/1:0
> 10.6.3.130 
> ip route vrf 5500000001-99 10.14.62.0 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.1

just noticed: does it look any different when you remove the next-hop?
i.e. 

ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/0:0
ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/1:0

those are p2p links, right?

	oli