[c-nsp] CEF-based per-packet load-sharing under MPLS VPN
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
oboehmer at cisco.com
Wed Mar 30 11:11:40 EST 2005
everton at lab.ipaccess.diveo.net.br
<mailto:everton at lab.ipaccess.diveo.net.br> wrote on Wednesday, March 30,
2005 4:52 PM:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:42:28PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
> wrote:
>>
>>> ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/0:0
>>> 10.4.62.2
>>> ip route vrf 5500000001-99 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 Serial6/0/1:0
>>> 10.6.3.130
>>> ip route vrf 5500000001-99 10.14.62.0 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.1
>>
>> just noticed: does it look any different when you remove the
>> next-hop?
>>
>> those are p2p links, right?
>
> Yes, they're p2p. Removal of the next-hop
> does not seem to make things different:
Ack.. I stand corrected, I think I didn't replicate the setup accurately
in my lab and reached the wrong conclusions. Trying it in a fresh
environment, I fail because of the same reasons (0.0.0.0 as next-hop)..
oli
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list