[c-nsp] 12008 replacement, 7300?
Pete Templin
petelists at templin.org
Fri May 13 10:03:04 EDT 2005
Matthew Crocker wrote:
> If you don't need the extra chassis bandwidth you could just replace
> your aging LCs and upgrade your RPs to PRP-2s. If you stay with the
> 12000 series you can upgrade incrementally adding memory/CPU where
> you need it. If you forklift to a 7300 you will be junking a lot of
> gear and limiting yourself to future growth.
> On May 13, 2005, at 2:40 AM, matthew zeier wrote:
>
>>I'm continually plagued by problems with some aging 12008s we have
>>and their
>>old, EOL LCs. I've been tasked with finding a replacement option.
What are the exact limitations of line cards in the 12008? I've heard
(somewhere) that it can only take E0/1/2 LCs, so no E3 cards could be a
big drawback.
TIA,
pt
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list