[c-nsp] NAT and VRF's
Gary Roberton
gary.ciscomail at gmail.com
Wed May 25 11:51:27 EDT 2005
Hi Geoff
You can use NAT on a per vrf basis with your nat inside and outside
statements on the relevant interfaces and the nat overload statements
in the following format;
ip nat inside source list <extended_list_name> interface f0/1 vrf red overload
static translations are like this;
ip nat inside source static 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 vrf red
where 1.1.1.1 is your inside address and 2.2.2.2 is your outside address
Hope this is useful
Gary
On 5/25/05, Geoffrey Cauchi <geoffrey.cauchi at datastream.com.mt> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to setup a router with vrf lite, where I have
> two interfaces, F0/0 and F0/1.
>
> Consider the following setup:
>
> int F0/0 is configured in a vrf named green
> int F0/1 is configured in a vrf named red
>
> int f0/0 has a private IP 172.18.0.0/24, while int f0/1 has
> a public ip 195.214.5.6/24, and I want to configure NAT.
>
> Routing between the two VRF's is working correctly, however
> NAT is not. Does anyone know how this can be configured.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Geoff
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list