[c-nsp] Switch recommendation

[kevin gannon]

PPPoe maybe ?

Regards
Kevin

On 11/9/05, Vincent De Keyzer <vincent at dekeyzer.net> wrote:
> Well, OK, I see your point - and I got the same question off-list too, so
> here is the situation:
>
> This is for a (pre-)Wimax service. We need to cover the whole city with 100
> base stations, with up to 200 users per BS - that's what gives the 20,000
> figure.
>
> The L2 domain has to spread over the whole city, because a user might roam
> across BSs, and he should be able to continue working without renewing his
> IP address (we made a test on a tramway recently, and it worked fine over a
> journey of several kilometers).
>
> But indeed we will slice this into several flat L2 networks, just to limit
> the size of the broadcast domain.
>
> Still, the switches close to the default gateways will need to know all
> these MAC addresses (even if in separate VLANs).
>
> Vincent
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Durack
> > Sent: mercredi 9 novembre 2005 17:15
> > To: Vincent De Keyzer
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; Church, Chuck
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Switch recommendation
> >
> > I think what Chuck is trying to say is: How big is your L2 broadcast
> > domain!!??
> >
> > I know we had severe pain when we were running large, flat L2 domains
> > in the 1000+ MAC range. I shudder to think what 10,000+ would be like.
> >
> > But maybe your environment is much more controlled...
> >
> > Tim:>
> >
> > On 11/9/05, Vincent De Keyzer <vincent at dekeyzer.net> wrote:
> > > A handful. Today 2, tomorrow maybe 10?
> > >
> > > Vincent
> > >
> > > > How many VLANs?   (Please don't say '1')...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Chuck Church
> > > > Lead Design Engineer
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > > > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vincent De
> > > > Keyzer
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 7:19 AM
> > > > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > Subject: [c-nsp] Switch recommendation
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have the following requirements for a switch :
> > > >
> > > > *     ability to handle over 20,000 MAC addresses
> > > > *     a few GigE ports (1 now, maybe 4 later)
> > > > *     a few FE ports (6 now, maybe 12 or 16 later)
> > > > *     no layer 3 required
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I have the feeling that those requirements are somewhat unusual - a
> > few
> > > > ports vs. a large number of MAC addresses.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is the 4503 a good choice for those requirements? What cards should I
> > > > stick
> > > > in there?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Is there anything cheaper that would do the job?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Vincent
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>