[c-nsp] Cisco 11506 vs. cisco 6500 CSM and SSL module

[Önder Ergün (Probil-İstanbul)]

I think Cisco will continue to sell a separate box for a load balancer because not everybody has to buy a 6500 to make load-balancing. But if you have already a 6500, CSM seems to be the logical way to go.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vikas Sharma
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 6:21 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco 11506 vs. cisco 6500 CSM and SSL module

Hi,
 I am planning to deploy the load balancer. Initially I have thought of CIsco 11506. Then I got to know about 6500 switch also support the same functionality with CSM and SSL module and give better performance compared to 11506. I was wondering if Cisco is already providing the same feature in a module form in 6500 switch, why it need to provide another product? Pls send me comparison details as I need to deploy it in my network.
  Regards
Vikas
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/