[c-nsp] MLFR versus MLP

[Mark Rogaski]

An entity claiming to be Jessup, Toby (Toby.Jessup at qwest.com) wrote:
: 
: MLFR supports PVCs, providing a services muxing flexibilty MLP lacks.
: Why would an SP use MLP instead of MLFR?
: 

If the SP is only providing layer 2 connectivity, then MLP eally doesn't
offer anything but extra headaches.  If they're doing layer 3, then they
may opt for MLP to allow fragmentation for VoIP purposes.

Mark

-- 
[]                        |
[] Mark Rogaski           |       Consistency requires you to be as
[] wendigo at pobox.com      |       ignorant today as you were a year ago.
[] mrogaski at cpan.org      |                     -- Bernard Berenson
[]                        |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20051124/94625e13/attachment.bin