[c-nsp] LC-1OC12/POS-SM

[serghei]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 If on same router an LC-4OC3/POS-SM card is working perfect with 4 full stm1 
connections, shoud I have problems with the stm4 card using same 
configuration ?
 This is the 4oc3 card running at full capacity (engine 0 too)
execute-on slot 2 show proc cpu | exc 0.0
========= Line Card (Slot 2) =========

CPU utilization for five seconds: 44%/42%; one minute: 43%; five minutes: 42%
 PID Runtime(ms)   Invoked      uSecs   5Sec   1Min   5Min TTY Process
   5    28024664   1636965      17119  1.35%  0.18%  0.12%   0 Check heaps

  FRU:  Linecard/Module: LC-4OC3/POS-SM=
  FRU:  Linecard/Module: LC-4OC3/POS-SM=
        Processor Memory: MEM-GRP/LC-256=
        Packet Memory: MEM-LC-PKT-128=
  L3 Engine: 0 - OC12 (622 Mbps)

 Thank you, serg

On Friday 25 November 2005 13:05, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >  Can you please give me a feedback about this card ? I need to use an
> > stm4 connection, and someone told me that the card can't go to speeds
> > higher then 400-500mbps. I need a feedback about maximum pps and bps
> > that card support in production (other than cisco docs) ?
>
> As this is a first generation, software-based linecard (every feature
> will be executed on the LC-CPU), the performance depends on the number
> of features you have enabled on the LC and/or on the box. The feature
> impact is roughly comparable to other software-based platforms (like the
> 7500/VIP, 7200/NPE, etc.)..
>
>  oli

- -- 
GPG Key: http://serghei.net/gpg/serg_at_evolva_dot_ro.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDhvndEwf6k3keB0YRAhHhAJwLxMg7YIly8q5rWQziTYVAkbC6SACfak34
F3+WB0GcDsKXscwEPWR2ubE=
=CgP0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----