[c-nsp] Graphing traffic for specific BGP peer on exchange points

[Ian Cox]

At 01:14 PM 10/1/2005 +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 12:44:44PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:
> > MAC accounting (as suggested by others) would be my choice..
>
>We've been doing that, on 7200s, and have been quite happy with it.
>
>Now we're using a 7603/SUP720 as peering point router ("hardware
>forwarding, hardware IPv6, HW control plane rate limiting, etc.")
>and it doesn't *have* MAC accounting :-(

On a positive note, with 7600-SIP-400 and the GE SPA we just released 
(12.2(18)SXF we added support for the much requested MAC address accounting.

http://www/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps368/module_installation_and_configuration_guides_chapter09186a0080523f3c.html#wp1131335

The GE SPAs.


Ian


>Do you know whether that's a hardware limitation, or just "not
>implemented yet"?  In the latter case, I could open a TAC case to
>make "customer demand" visible, but if the hardware just can't do it,
>we'll need to go for some workaround on netflow/peer-as basis (which
>really isn't the same thing, as we have neighbour ASes with multiple
>routers on the same exchange).
>
>gert
>--
>USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> 
>//www.muc.de/~gert/
>Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
>fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/