[c-nsp] Sub-Interface Support 122.25.SEC 3750

[Alex Foster]

Hi David,

Yeh - I can do this.....I did think about this as an option - this would
allow me to create multiple SVIs across a trunked interface - so I guess
this would give me the (sub)interfaces I need.... havn't looked into
configuring an SVI with VRF but assume there are no issues here....

Regards

Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: David Prall [mailto:dcp at dcptech.com] 
Sent: 10 October 2005 14:49
To: Alex Foster; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Sub-Interface Support 122.25.SEC 3750

Alex,
What happens when you configure the port as a switchport trunk and then
configure an SVI. 

David

--
David C Prall dcp at dcptech.com http://dcp.dcptech.com
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alex Foster
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 7:49 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Sub-Interface Support 122.25.SEC 3750
> 
> I Posted this a couple of days ago - and didn't get any feedback - so
> was just wondering if the Cisco guys on the list are aware of 
> this - and
> whether they have workarounds in place or a fix - I really 
> need the use
> of VRF with Sub-Interfaces - which would only be available in the SEC
> release - except for some reason the ability to configure 
> Sub-interfaces
> isn't there.....
> 
> The response you get from the switch is ....
> 
> Switch (config)#int gigabitEthernet 1/0/10.100
>                                ^
> % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
> 
> 
> "Strange one this, not sure if its been done on purpose or whether the
> software guys have left it out by mistake - but it appears as though
> 122-25.SEC for the 3750 doesn't support sub-interfaces - 
> 122.25.SEB did,
> but I upgraded to SEC for VRF functionality and found I 
> couldn't create
> sub-interfaces - rolled back to SEB and there you have it (but no VRF,
> obviously).  Can anyone comment - or I have missed the boat 
> and someones
> decided that this feature is no longer of any use to anyone..."
> 
> Any help with this would be appreciated .... Regards
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail and any attachments is 
> confidential and may be subject to legal professional 
> privilege. It is intended solely for the attention and use of 
> the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended 
> recipient, or person responsible for delivering this 
> information to the intended recipient, please notify the 
> sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or 
> his/her representative you are prohibited from, and therefore 
> must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message 
> or any part of it. The views expressed in this e-mail may not 
> represent those of Gamma Telecom.
> 
> This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 



This message has been scanned for viruses by MailController -
www.MailController.altohiway.com