[c-nsp] MLPPP and ip load-sharing per-packet

[Brian Turnbow]

I didn't follow all the thread but you might want to take a look at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008044677d.html
Be careful as in some cases interleaving requires the use of LLQ, so you would need qos as well

Regards
Brian

 

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of McCallum, Robert
Sent: lunedì 10 ottobre 2005 14.51
To: Jon Lewis; Rodney Dunn
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] MLPPP and ip load-sharing per-packet

> I suppose it could be that we have brief traffic spikes high enough
that I either need more bandwidth or a service-policy giving VOIP
traffic preferential treatment over the Mu1.


Think that QOS might be a good idea.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                | 
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/