[c-nsp] router / switch recommendation

Aivars aivars at ml.lv
Sun Oct 16 08:29:45 EDT 2005


If you think that 48+2 ports are enough, then you can use 3560. The
only difference is that 3750 has no stack ports.

If you think about 45xx take a good look at 65xx with SUP 32. I don't
like 45xx because it has a 6Gbit/s limit per slot, not
to even mention feature difference.

Aivars

Saturday, October 15, 2005, 7:00:12 PM, you wrote:

AG> Hi ...

AG> I'm looking for a router / switch with 24-48 ports & 2 fiber uplinks that
AG> can support up to 500 SVI's, 2 OSPF instances, a handful of small customer
AG> BGP sessions (default-route only), and probably about 1000 routes in total.
AG> The device should be able to push ~35Mbps (total across various ports). I
AG> don't anticipate needing to switch multicast in the near future. Do you
AG> think it is stretching it to try to do all this with a 3750? I guess the
AG> next step up would be a 4500, but *gulp* that's a big step $$-wise (we're a
AG> pretty small ISP).

AG> Perhaps a 2800/3800 with an etherswitch module could also be an option ...
AG> seems a bit more expensive than the 3750 ...

AG> Any advice appreciated,
AG> Adam

AG> ---
AG> [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System]

AG> _______________________________________________
AG> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
AG> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
AG> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list