[c-nsp] WS-G5482 vs G5483 1000baseT GBICs?

[Suchy Daniel]

Inserting G5482 model (at least into WS-X6516A/Cat6500/Sup2/CatOS) 
results into: %SYS-3-TRANSCEIVER_FAILED: Transceiver integrity check on 
port 3/1 failed: bad checksum.

G5482 have higher power requirements, that's I thing main reason, why 
these GBICs aren't supported in other chassis than 25/3500XL/3550... and 
G5483 are supported in 3500XL too, so G5483 seems to be better choice 
(if you can select).

Tristan Gulyas wrote:
> All,
> 
> Looking at purchasing a few of these secondhand.  They'll be used in 3500XL 
> switches primarily but they may also see some use in a 6500/4000 series 
> platform.
> 
> Checking the Cisco site, I can see that the 5482 was replaced by the 5483 - 
> the 5482 is only supported in the 2900/3500 series platforms whereas the 
> 5483 is supported in the 6500/4000 series platforms as well.
> 
> Has anyone had experience with these - in particular, the 5482 in 6500/4000s 
> and whether they work at all?  Also, is it possible for these to work in the 
> Catalyst 5000 3 port and 9 port GE blades (I understand they're not 
> supported but I've heard reports that they do indeed function).
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Tristan 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20051026/52007f71/signature-0001.bin