[c-nsp] The amount consumed of CPU in Cisco 7513 architecture
Diego de Oliveira
diegooli at terra.com.br
Tue Sep 6 06:57:20 EDT 2005
Thanks for all,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <oboehmer at cisco.com>
To: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rubensk at gmail.com>; "Diego de Oliveira"
<diegooli at terra.com.br>; <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:52 AM
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] The amount consumed of CPU in Cisco 7513 architecture
Rubens Kuhl Jr. <> wrote on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 3:38 AM:
> I also noticed on earlier 12.0S versions that named ACLs uses more CPU
> than numbered ACLs; don't know if this is still valid on newer
> versions, but I still default to numbered ACLs on 7500 routers.
All 12.0S releases shipping today don't support named ACLs in the forwarding
path w/ dCEF, so if you use a named ACL, the packets are punted to the RSP
for central CEF forwarding.
This restriction does not apply to 12.2 and later releases, and named ACLs
used in the control plane (i.e. for instance within route filters/maps) work
just fine in 12.0S.
> On 9/5/05, Diego de Oliveira <diegooli at terra.com.br> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Is anyone aware either PBR,ACL or NBAR consume more CPU process in
>> Cisco 7513 architecture? Today, I have a many ACLs and I see it´s
>> consume much more VIP CPU than when i remove these.it´s clear but i
>> need know if I replace these ACLs per some PBR ou NBAR I gonna gain
>> CPU process.
>> Diego Olveira
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 05/09/2005 / Versão:
Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
More information about the cisco-nsp